A 1977 study, for example, measured vaginal blood volume in women as they watched erotic film clips, some after having viewed a graphic depiction of an auto accident. The results haven’t been formally replicated by another lab since they were published, and as the Georgia team concedes in its original paper, there’s a long history of research demonstrating that anxiety itself can produce sexual arousal. In the non-homophobic group, the proportion was just one-third.īut even these penis-based findings won’t tell us very much about human nature. Around three-quarters of the guys in the homophobic group experienced some engorgement-not nearly as much as they’d had watching other clips, but enough to be labeled as either “moderately” or “definitely tumescent” by the researchers. All the men were clearly aroused by the lesbian and straight porn, but their sexual responses differed when it came to the gay clips. Using penile plethysmography, researchers compared the erectile responses of 35 homophobes and 29 non-homophobes to pornographic films in various gender configurations. Good news: This exact study was carried out in the mid-1990s at the University of Georgia. People get a little speedy when something upsets them, or turns them on. And it’s well-known that these two factors-salience and anxiety-tend to shrink reaction times. By that logic, me-gay pairings would be particularly nerve-racking to true homophobes. The sociologist Michael Kimmel has argued that some men are less afraid of gay people than they are of being labeled as gay ( and thus emasculated) themselves. But a homophobe would be more attuned to it for the opposite reason: It runs counter to his personal interests it makes him nervous. A homosexual might be more attuned to a picture of two men because it aligns with his personal interests-no surprise there. Or it could be that both gay people and homophobic straight people are more keyed up by gayness in general.
![covert straight gay porn covert straight gay porn](https://cdn77-pic.xvideos-cdn.com/videos/thumbs169lll/15/67/6c/15676cf9180ff84aca417bd4077ab100-1/15676cf9180ff84aca417bd4077ab100.5.jpg)
It could be that both gay people and homophobic straight people responded more quickly to the gay-themed imagery because they were all secretly gay. Whatever the precedents, their homo-say-what task leaves itself open to an easy, alternative interpretation.
![covert straight gay porn covert straight gay porn](https://cc.boyfriendtv.com/thumbs/bftv-320x240/2021-04/de/aa6abadde8e20708eb5001b4642d5c051.mp4-320x240-5.jpg)
On a subconscious level, at least, she’s associating the word me with gayness.
![covert straight gay porn covert straight gay porn](https://imggen.eporner.com/3807936/640/360/1.jpg)
If seeing the word me shortens a student’s reaction time for the gay-themed imagery, it’s taken as a sign of her implicit homosexuality.
![covert straight gay porn covert straight gay porn](http://acx4.com/t2/_v_4/39965281.jpg)
#Covert straight gay porn series
The researchers start by asking college freshmen, mostly women, to rate their sexual orientation on a scale from 1 to 10 (1 means completely straight 5 means bisexual 10 means totally gay) and then to say how much they agree with politically charged statements like, “Gay people make me nervous” and “I would feel uncomfortable having a gay roommate.” Once the students have been characterized according to their relative degrees of gayness and homophobia, they’re shown a series of icons or photos of wedding-cake figurines on a computer monitor-two women, two men, or a man with a woman-and told to label each one as being “gay” or “straight.” In a final twist, some of the “gay” and “straight” images are preceded on the screen by a subliminal verbal cue-a word flashed quickly on the screen that reads either me or others. The new study works like an elaborate game of “ homo say what?”: Evidence of private, homosexual urges is elicited by subtle verbal cues.